WhatsApp
Tecifo Solutions logo: orange hexagon cube with blue hexagon dotsTecifo.Book a call
← All work
AI/Productstarlingmx.com

Starling MX

AI-native organizational intelligence platform. We built the AI-first workspace interfaces, document workflows and brand asset management at the core of the product.

Sector
Enterprise AI / knowledge work
Engagement
Build — end-to-end product delivery
Timeline
Feb 2024 → ongoing
Team
2 engineers, 1 designer, client PM
01 — The problem

Starling MX had an AI thesis and no product surface to put it behind.

The founding team had spent eight months proving that a language model could answer questions about a company's internal material. What they did not have was a place for that answer to live. Documents sat in Google Drive, brand files in Dropbox, decisions in Notion, and every AI response arrived in a chat window disconnected from the file it was talking about. Pilot customers liked the demo and could not adopt it, because adopting it meant leaving whatever tool the work already lived in.

The second problem was editing. Users would ask for a rewrite, get good output, then copy it into Word, lose the formatting, and re-upload. Three of the first five pilot accounts named that round trip as the reason they stalled.

02 — How we solved it

What we built, and why in that order

01
One workspace object model
We replaced the folder-and-chat split with a single workspace object — documents, brand assets and threads all addressable by the same identifiers, stored in Supabase with row-level tenancy from day one.
02
AI in the document, not beside it
Claude and Gemini calls were bound to selections inside the editor. Every response carries the document, section and revision it came from, so an answer can be accepted as an edit rather than pasted.
03
ONLYOFFICE for real editing
Rather than rebuild Office fidelity, we integrated ONLYOFFICE behind our own document API. Users open a .docx or .pptx in-app, edit it with formatting intact, and AI actions operate on the same live file.
04
Brand and asset system
Logos, type, colour and approved imagery became first-class records the model can read, so generated decks and documents come out in the customer's brand instead of a generic template.
StackNext.jsTypeScriptSupabaseNotionClaudeGemini
Outcome
5 → 0
Tools in the editing round trip
8 wks
Pilot to first paid deployment
62%
Weekly active rate in pilot accounts
2
Model providers behind one interface
The moment AI edits landed inside the document, the product stopped being a demo. Adoption arguments we'd been losing for months just went away.
Product lead, Starling MX
03 — Where they are now

Starling MX is in production with paying customers and has moved from proving the idea to widening it.

Our role: Product engineering partner

The platform now runs live for a set of mid-market customers in professional services, with document workflows and brand asset management as the two features cited most in renewals. Model routing sits behind an internal abstraction, so the team switched a summarisation path from one provider to another in a single afternoon when pricing changed.

Work in 2026 has shifted from core surfaces to depth: permissioned sharing across client organisations, an approvals path for generated documents, and usage analytics that show which AI actions actually get accepted. We remain engaged on the AI layer and the editor while their in-house team has taken ownership of billing, admin and onboarding.

Next case studyGotobeatAI/MLSimilar problem?Start a projectinfo@tecifo.com

Have something that needs to ship?

Scope agreed in writing, architecture first, weekly increments you can review. Start with a 30-minute call or send the brief.